All but three states have opted out of ordering the controversial beef product famously dubbed "pink slime" for their school lunch programs says the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).
Iowa, South Dakota, and Nebraska will continue to buy ground beef with
added lean finely textured beef (LFTB), ammonia-treated scraps that are
used as filler.
Related: "The Making of the Term "Pink Slime"
Related: Does Eating Organic Food Make You a Jerk?
The USDA reports that by May 18, about 20 million pounds of beef without the filler and only about one million pounds of beef that may contain LFTB had been ordered by schools.
The meat industry has been hit hard by the rejection of "pink slime." Cargill and Tyson have both reported declines in beef revenue since March. South Dakota based-Beef Products Inc (BPI) the largest producer of LFTB, has announced that it is closing three of its plants (located in Texas, Kansas, and Iowa) at a loss of about 650 jobs.
Craig Letch, the company's director of food safety and quality, said in statement, "Based upon the misrepresentations that have been pervasive in the media to this point, it comes as no surprise that the majority of states have currently elected to purchase ground beef that does not contain lean finely textured beef." The company has also set up a website, beefisbeef.com, to dispel what it maintains are myths about the product.
Related: "The Making of the Term "Pink Slime"
The term “pink slime” was coined by former USDA scientist Gerald Zirnstein
and used in a 2009 interview by the New YorkTimes on the safety of beef processing. In 2011, the product was featured
on a segment of JamieOliver’s Food Revolution.
The widespread use of LFTB really caught the
public's attention in March 2012, when food columnist and mother Bettina
Siegel launched a petition to ban it from the National School Lunch Program. Within a few days, it received over a 250,000 signatures. “When I launched the petition, I could
never have foreseen that it would go viral and garner over a quarter of a
million signatures,” Siegel tells Shine. “But I suspect that petition
signers weren't just supporting my relatively narrow request relating to school
food. I think they were voicing a larger concern about the lack of transparency
in our food supply and the coziness between the beef industry and the USDA on this
issue.”
While the USDA says the product is safe to eat, many consumers were
surprised (and grossed out) to learn that much of the ground beef they
had been purchasing for decades contained "pink slime." LFTB doesn't
have to be labeled and it is estimated that it can be found in 70% of
conventional ground beef (it has never been allowed in organic meat).
Due to public outcry, the USDA agreed to let schools opt out and many
supermarket and fast food chains including McDonald's and Taco Bell also
discontinued selling meat with the filler.
Related: Does Eating Organic Food Make You a Jerk?
The USDA reports that by May 18, about 20 million pounds of beef without the filler and only about one million pounds of beef that may contain LFTB had been ordered by schools.
The meat industry has been hit hard by the rejection of "pink slime." Cargill and Tyson have both reported declines in beef revenue since March. South Dakota based-Beef Products Inc (BPI) the largest producer of LFTB, has announced that it is closing three of its plants (located in Texas, Kansas, and Iowa) at a loss of about 650 jobs.
Craig Letch, the company's director of food safety and quality, said in statement, "Based upon the misrepresentations that have been pervasive in the media to this point, it comes as no surprise that the majority of states have currently elected to purchase ground beef that does not contain lean finely textured beef." The company has also set up a website, beefisbeef.com, to dispel what it maintains are myths about the product.
Beef without “pink slime” costs schools about three percent more to
buy. “When the USDA announced its policy
change [to let schools opt out] on the ninth day of my petition, I worried that
it might not be a meaningful development if schools couldn't afford to take advantage
of the non-LFTB option,” says Siegel. “So I was happily surprised to learn
this week that the vast majority of school districts have been able to buy
non-LFTB beef for their kids. That's a real victory for transparency and
choice.”
No comments:
Post a Comment